This Week’s Sample!

In so far as the two parties, Joe and Sam Seller have an agreement for Sam to let Joe expand the restaurant upon his neighboring lot, Joe has a prerogative to consider his next move. However, the same may not take an inordinate amount of time.
Contracts, as governed by the Uniform Civil Code are open to scrutiny and are heavily subject to interpretation by a court of law – to induce reason and justifications.
Article 1 – 205 (b) of the Uniform Civil Code defines the term seasonability as applied to contracts. It essentially states that an action is deemed seasonable if it has been completed within the time agreed upon. And then, if no such time has been agreed upon, the article states that the action must be completed “at or within” a reasonable amount of time.
Therefore, if Sam takes his frustrations to court, it would be the outlook of the judge determining whether three months is a reasonable amount of time for securing funding and proceeding thereon.
Sam has a strong case here, because what seems like an inordinate amount of delay has been caused by – what may be interpreted as a non-genuine reason. It essentially is a personal failure on the part of Joe, and that makes the case all the more weak for him. Sam, therefore should take this case to court.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.